Each January on the SEI Weblog, we current the ten most-visited posts of the earlier yr. This yr’s prime 10 record highlights the SEI’s work in software program acquisition, synthetic intelligence, massive language fashions, safe coding, insider danger mitigation, and enterprise danger administration. The posts, which have been printed between January 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024, are introduced under in reverse order based mostly on the variety of visits.
by Ipek Ozkaya and Brigid O’Hearn
The fiscal yr 2022 Nationwide Protection Authorization Act (NDAA) Part 835, “Impartial Research on Technical Debt in Software program-Intensive Techniques,” required the Secretary of Protection to have interaction a federally funded analysis and growth middle (FFRDC) “to check technical debt in software-intensive techniques.” To fulfill this requirement and lead this work, the Division of Protection (DoD) chosen the Carnegie Mellon College (CMU) Software program Engineering Institute (SEI), which is a acknowledged chief within the follow of managing technical debt. Based on NDAA Part 835, the aim of the examine was to supply, amongst different issues, analyses and suggestions on quantitative measures for assessing technical debt, present and finest practices for measuring and managing technical debt and its related prices, and practices for decreasing technical debt.
Our crew spent greater than a yr conducting the impartial examine. The report we produced describes the conduct of the examine, summarizes the technical tendencies noticed, and presents the ensuing suggestions. On this SEI Weblog put up, we summarize a number of suggestions that apply to the DoD and different growth organizations in search of to research, handle, and scale back technical debt. You will discover an entire dialogue of the examine methodology, findings, and suggestions within the SEI’s Report back to the Congressional Protection Committees on Nationwide Protection Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal 12 months 2022 Part 835 Impartial Research on Technical Debt in Software program-Intensive Techniques.
Learn the put up in its entirety.
by Douglas Schmidt and John E. Robert
There may be appreciable curiosity in utilizing generative AI instruments, equivalent to massive language fashions (LLMs), to revolutionize industries and create new alternatives within the industrial and authorities domains. For a lot of Division of Protection (DoD) software program acquisition professionals, the promise of LLMs is interesting, however there’s additionally a deep-seated concern that LLMs don’t tackle right this moment’s challenges attributable to privateness issues, potential for inaccuracy within the output, and insecurity or uncertainty about learn how to use LLMs successfully and responsibly. This weblog put up is the second in a collection devoted to exploring how generative AI, significantly LLMs equivalent to ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, might be utilized throughout the DoD to reinforce software program acquisition actions.
Our first weblog put up on this collection introduced 10 Advantages and 10 Challenges of Making use of LLMs to DoD Software program Acquisition and instructed particular use instances the place generative AI can present worth to software program acquisition actions. This second weblog put up expands on that dialogue by displaying particular examples of utilizing LLMs for software program acquisition within the context of a doc summarization experiment, in addition to codifying the teachings we realized from this experiment and our associated work on making use of generative AI to software program engineering.
Learn the put up in its entirety.
by Robin Ruefle
Incident response is a vital want all through authorities and business as cyber menace actors look to compromise vital belongings inside organizations with cascading, usually catastrophic, results. In 2021, for instance, a hacker allegedly accessed a Florida water therapy plant’s pc techniques and poisoned the water provide. Throughout the U.S. vital nationwide infrastructure, 77 % of organizations have seen an increase in insider-driven cyber threats during the last three years. The 2023 IBM Price of a Knowledge Breach report highlights the essential position of getting a well-tested incident response plan. Firms and not using a examined plan in place will face 82 % increased prices within the occasion of a cyber assault, in contrast to people who have carried out and examined such a plan.
Researchers within the SEI CERT Division compiled 10 classes realized from our greater than 35 years of growing and dealing with incident response and safety groups all through the globe. These classes are related to incident response groups contending with an ever-evolving cyber menace panorama. In honor of the CERT Division (additionally referred to the CERT Coordination Heart in our work with the Discussion board of Incident Response and Safety Groups) celebrating 35 years of operation, on this weblog put up we have a look again at among the classes realized from our Cyber Safety Incident Response Crew (CSIRT) capability constructing experiences that additionally apply to different areas of safety operations.
Learn the put up in its entirety.
by Roger Black
Based on a 2023 Ponemon examine, the variety of reported insider danger incidents and the prices related to them continues to rise. With greater than 7,000 reported instances in 2023, the typical insider danger incident value organizations over $600,000. To assist organizations assess their insider danger packages and determine potential vulnerabilities that would end in insider threats, the SEI CERT Division has launched two instruments obtainable for obtain on its web site. Beforehand obtainable solely to licensed companions, the Insider Menace Vulnerability Evaluation (ITVA) and Insider Menace Program Analysis (ITPE) toolkits present sensible strategies to evaluate your group’s potential to handle insider danger. This put up describes the aim and use of the toolkits, with a give attention to the workbook parts of the toolkits which might be the first strategies of program evaluation.
Learn the put up in its entirety.
by David Svoboda
In latest weeks a number of vulnerabilities have rocked the Rust neighborhood, inflicting many to query the security of the borrow checker, or of Rust generally. On this put up, we look at two such vulnerabilities: the primary is CVE-2024-3094, which includes some malicious information within the xz library, and the second is CVE-2024-24576, which includes command-injection vulnerabilities in Home windows. How did these vulnerabilities come up, how have been they found, and the way do they contain Rust? Extra importantly, may Rust be inclined to extra related vulnerabilities sooner or later?
Final yr we printed two weblog posts in regards to the safety offered by the Rust programming language. We mentioned the reminiscence security and concurrency security offered by Rust’s borrow checker. We additionally described among the limitations of Rust’s safety mannequin, equivalent to its restricted potential to stop numerous injection assaults, and the unsafe key phrase, which permits builders to bypass Rust’s safety mannequin when mandatory. Again then, our conclusion was that no language might be totally safe, but the borrow checker did present important, albeit restricted, reminiscence and concurrency security when not bypassed with the unsafe key phrase. We additionally examined Rust by the lens of supply and binary evaluation, gauged its stability and maturity, and realized that the constraints and expectations for language maturity have slowly advanced over the many years. Rust is transferring within the course of maturity right this moment, which is distinct from what was thought-about a mature programming language in 1980. Moreover, Rust has made some notable stability ensures, equivalent to promising to deprecate relatively than delete any crates in crates.io to keep away from repeating the Leftpad fiasco.
Learn the put up in its entirety.
by Ipek Ozkaya, Douglas Schmidt, and Michael Hilton
The preliminary surge of pleasure and worry surrounding generative synthetic intelligence (AI) is steadily evolving right into a extra reasonable perspective. Whereas the jury continues to be out on the precise return on funding and tangible enhancements from generative AI, the fast tempo of change is difficult software program engineering training and curricula. Educators have needed to adapt to the continued developments in generative AI to supply a practical perspective to their college students, balancing consciousness, wholesome skepticism, and curiosity.
In a latest SEI webcast, researchers mentioned the affect of generative AI on software program engineering training. SEI and Carnegie Mellon College specialists spoke about the usage of generative AI within the curriculum and the classroom, mentioned how school and college students can most successfully use generative AI, and regarded issues about ethics and fairness when utilizing these instruments. The panelists took questions from the viewers and drew on their expertise as educators to talk to the vital questions generative AI raises for software program engineering training.
This weblog put up options an edited transcript of responses from the unique webcast. Some questions and solutions have been rearranged and revised for readability.
Learn the put up in its entirety.
by Jeff Gennari, Shing-hon Lau, and Samuel J. Perl
Massive language fashions (LLMs) have proven a outstanding potential to ingest, synthesize, and summarize information whereas concurrently demonstrating important limitations in finishing real-world duties. One notable area that presents each alternatives and dangers for leveraging LLMs is cybersecurity. LLMs might empower cybersecurity specialists to be extra environment friendly or efficient at stopping and stopping assaults. Nonetheless, adversaries might additionally use generative synthetic intelligence (AI) applied sciences in sort. We have now already seen proof of actors utilizing LLMs to assist in cyber intrusion actions (e.g., WormGPT, FraudGPT, and so on.). Such misuse raises many vital cybersecurity-capability-related questions together with
- Can an LLM like GPT-4 write novel malware?
- Will LLMs grow to be vital parts of large-scale cyber-attacks?
- Can we belief LLMs to supply cybersecurity specialists with dependable info?
The reply to those questions is determined by the analytic strategies chosen and the outcomes they supply. Sadly, present strategies and strategies for evaluating the cybersecurity capabilities of LLMs usually are not complete. Just lately, a crew of researchers within the SEI CERT Division labored with OpenAI to develop higher approaches for evaluating LLM cybersecurity capabilities. This SEI Weblog put up, excerpted from a just lately printed paper that we coauthored with OpenAI researchers Joel Parish and Girish Sastry, summarizes 14 suggestions to assist assessors precisely consider LLM cybersecurity capabilities.
Learn the put up in its entirety.
by John E. Robert and Douglas Schmidt
Division of Protection (DoD) software program acquisition has lengthy been a fancy and document-heavy course of. Traditionally, many software program acquisition actions, equivalent to producing Requests for Info (RFIs), summarizing authorities rules, figuring out related industrial requirements, and drafting challenge standing updates, have required appreciable human-intensive effort. Nonetheless, the appearance of generative synthetic intelligence (AI) instruments, together with massive language fashions (LLMs), presents a promising alternative to speed up and streamline sure elements of the software program acquisition course of.
Software program acquisition is one in every of many advanced mission-critical domains that will profit from making use of generative AI to reinforce and/or speed up human efforts. This weblog put up is the primary in a collection devoted to exploring how generative AI, significantly LLMs like ChatGPT-4, can improve software program acquisition actions. On this put up we current 10 advantages and 10 challenges of making use of LLMs to the software program acquisition course of and counsel particular use instances the place generative AI can present worth. Our focus is on offering well timed info to software program acquisition professionals, together with protection software program builders, program managers, techniques engineers, cybersecurity analysts, and different key stakeholders, who function inside difficult constraints and prioritize safety and accuracy.
Learn the put up in its entirety.
by Mark Sherman
The typical code pattern comprises 6,000 defects per million strains of code, and the SEI’s analysis has discovered that 5 % of those defects grow to be vulnerabilities. This interprets to roughly 3 vulnerabilities per 10,000 strains of code. Can ChatGPT assist enhance this ratio? There was a lot hypothesis about how instruments constructed on prime of huge language fashions (LLMs) may affect software program growth, extra particularly, how they’ll change the best way builders write code and consider it.
In March 2023 a crew of CERT Safe Coding researchers—the crew included Robert Schiela, David Svoboda, and myself—used ChatGPT 3.5 to look at the noncompliant software program code examples in our CERT Safe Coding customary, particularly the SEI CERT C Coding Commonplace. On this put up, I current our experiment and findings, which present that whereas ChatGPT 3.5 has promise, there are clear limitations.
Learn the put up in its entirety.
by Greg Touhill
The position of the chief info safety officer (CISO) has by no means been extra vital to organizational success. The current and near-future for CISOs might be marked by breathtaking technical advances, significantly these related to the inclusion of synthetic intelligence applied sciences being built-in into enterprise capabilities, in addition to emergent authorized and regulatory challenges. Continued advances in generative synthetic intelligence (AI) will speed up the proliferation of deepfakes designed to erode public belief in on-line info and public establishments. Moreover, these challenges might be amplified by an unstable world theater during which nefarious actors and nation states chase alternatives to use any potential organizational weak spot. Some forecasts have already characterised 2024 as a stress cooker surroundings for CISOs. In such an surroundings, abilities are vital. On this put up I define the highest 10 abilities that CISOs want for 2024 and past. These suggestions draw upon my expertise because the director of the SEI’s CERT Division, in addition to my service as the primary federal chief info safety officer of the USA, main cyber operations on the U.S. Division of Homeland Safety, and my prolonged navy service as a communications and our on-line world operations officer.
Learn the put up in its entirety.
Trying Forward in 2025
We publish a brand new put up on the SEI Weblog weekly. Within the coming months, search for posts highlighting the SEI’s work in synthetic intelligence, machine studying, cybersecurity, software program engineering, and extra.