20.2 C
New York
Monday, March 31, 2025

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs. Google Tensor G4: What’s the most effective cell chipset of 2025?


It is a notably attention-grabbing yr within the cell business, with Qualcomm and MediaTek making sizeable good points with their choices. Qualcomm switched to a fully-custom design after a decade, and the result’s that the Snapdragon 8 Elite has generational good points over the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, and it’s magnificent.

MediaTek is not sitting idly by both, and the Dimensity 9400 has notable design wins and a lot better efficiency. In contrast, Google’s resolution to play it secure with the Tensor G4 feels shortsighted, and the Pixel 9 Professional XL does not convey any significant upgrades on this space.

Hardwired

Android Central's LLoyd with a bionic eye

(Picture credit score: Nicholas Sutrich / Android Central)

In Hardwired, AC Senior Editor Harish Jonnalagadda delves into all issues {hardware}, together with telephones, audio merchandise, storage servers, and networking gear.

I used over a dozen telephones powered by the most recent chipsets within the final three months, and it is time to check out how they differ. Earlier than I get to the benchmarks, a fast overview of what is new this yr. Clearly, we have to begin with Qualcomm, as a result of the Snapdragon 8 Elite is totally different to what we have seen previously.

Qualcomm went to a completely {custom} CPU design in a transfer that is much like what Apple does with its personal silicon, and it allowed the chip vendor to fine-tune the platform by a substantial quantity. It is not astonishing, then, that the platform has the most effective single-and multi-core CPU scores of something I examined, and it even outmatches the iPhone 16 Professional Max — an enormous deal in and of itself.

The good points with the GPU aren’t as noticeable, and whereas it continues to be the most effective round, it does not have an outsized lead. Fortunately, MediaTek was additionally in a position to ship a platform that is implausible, and the Dimensity 9400 has engaging upgrades. Though it makes use of inventory Arm cores, MediaTek’s resolution to solely leverage massive cores makes a transparent distinction in the case of efficiency. MediaTek has been doing this for 2 years now, and it nailed the basics.

Vivo X200 Pro next to X100 Ultra and X100 Pro

(Picture credit score: Apoorva Bhardwaj / Android Central)

Apparently, the GPU on the Dimensity 9400 is ready to maintain its personal in opposition to what Qualcomm is providing. That simply hasn’t been the case in earlier years, and I even managed to get higher scores with the Immortalis-G925 than the Adreno 830. Qualcomm nonetheless leads the best way with sustained efficiency, however it’s nice to see MediaTek gaining floor on this key space.

There is not a lot to speak concerning the Tensor G4, as Google is utilizing the identical core configuration and manufacturing node because the G3. Whereas Qualcomm and MediaTek made the change to a 3nm node — delivering massive good points in effectivity — Google continues to be utilizing the 4nm node, and the Pixel 9 Professional XL does not fairly have the identical battery longevity.

I am utilizing ASUS’s Zenfone 12 Extremely because the Qualcomm baseline because it has a great thermal answer whereas nonetheless technically being a mainstream telephone. I went with the Vivo X200 Professional to spotlight the Dimensity 9400; whereas the Discover X8 Professional additionally makes use of the identical platform, I felt that the X200 Professional did a greater job at gaming, so that is the one I am utilizing. And with Google, the Pixel 9 Professional XL has the most effective thermal administration system within the Pixel 9 collection, so that is the one I used.

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Class

ASUS Zenfone 12 Extremely

Vivo X200 Professional

Google Pixel 9 Professional XL

Geekbench 6 (single-core)

3116

2381

1895

Geekbench 6 (multi-core)

9824

7175

4111

PCMark Work 3.0 (General)

25558

15731

13028

PCMark Work 3.0 (Internet Looking)

32147

13716

10322

PCMark Work 3.0 (Video Modifying)

9152

5823

7606

PCMark Work 3.0 (Writing)

32843

24744

15582

PCMark Work 3.0 (Photograph Modifying)

59086

13582

19293

3DMark Wild Life Excessive (rating)

4782

6070

2483

3DMark Wild Life Excessive (FPS)

28.64

36.35

14.8

3DMark Photo voltaic Bay (rating)

7863

11021

NA

3DMark Photo voltaic Bay (FPS)

29.9

41.91

NA

Geekbench AI (Quantized Rating)

5478

2436

2620

In relation to the CPU, it is clear that Qualcomm has a particular edge this yr. The {custom} design allowed gadgets just like the Zenfone 12 Extremely and Honor Magic 7 Professional to web the most effective scores in Geekbench 6’s single- and multi-core workloads, and I do not see this altering over the course of 2025. The Dimensity 9400 does an incredible job as effectively, and whereas it’s sooner than final yr, it does not outshine Qualcomm.

As you possibly can think about, the Pixel 9 Professional XL lags behind its rivals, posting scores that simply do not measure up — the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3-based OnePlus 13R does a greater job. Annoyingly, it is a comparable story with the GPU as effectively, and the machine simply does not come near 2025 flagships. That mentioned, I did not see any slowdowns in common use, and if something, Google did an incredible job with optimization with the Android 15 replace, and the Pixel 9 Professional XL has a lot better fluidity than earlier years.

The largest problem is that the 9 Professional XL simply does not ship the identical degree of efficiency in demanding video games. You do not get secure framerates, it throttles too quickly, and it does not even measure as much as Qualcomm and MediaTek’s 2024 choices, a lot much less their newest platforms.

Google says it positioned on-device AI because the differentiator with the Tensor G4, however even on this space, it does not do wherever in addition to Qualcomm. It has a slender lead over the Dimensity 9400 in Geekbench’s AI workloads, however the Zenfone 12 Extremely as soon as once more has the distinct edge, with Qualcomm’s NPU clearly the one to beat.

ASUS Zenfone 12 Ultra running Balatro

(Picture credit score: Harish Jonnalagadda / Android Central)

In relation to gaming, the Immortalis-G925 within the Dimensity 9400 delivered the most effective scores in 3DMark’s Wild Life Excessive and Photo voltaic Bay checks. That mentioned, the platform tends to throttle aggressively, and the X200 Professional had a stability rating of simply 49% within the demanding Metal Nomad Gentle endurance run. In contrast, Qualcomm-powered gadgets managed a rating of a minimum of 70%, with most gadgets going as much as 90% in the identical check.

The draw back to restricted throttling is that Qualcomm-based gadgets are inclined to run hotter. The X200 Professional went as much as a most of 44 levels Celsius after an prolonged gaming session, however the Zenfone 12 Extremely hit 46 levels, and Nubia’s Z70 Extremely obtained as much as 59 levels — the very best of any telephone I examined.

Artificial checks do not reveal the entire story, however having used these gadgets for an prolonged period of time, what’s clear is that each Qualcomm and MediaTek have achieved a superb job this yr. I am glad that MediaTek is ready to ship a product that goes up in opposition to Qualcomm within the high-end class — that simply hasn’t been the case in earlier years.

Vivo X200 Pro camera module highlighted

(Picture credit score: Apoorva Bhardwaj / Android Central)

One other attention-grabbing level is the ISP; whereas Qualcomm continues to make good points on this space, MediaTek outdid itself this yr, with the X200 Professional and Discover X8 Professional delivering the most effective digicam packages of 2025. In fact, the digicam {hardware} and tuning makes a sizeable distinction, however the ISP on the Dimensity 9400 is an integral a part of the package deal, and MediaTek did all the fitting issues.

It is a comparable scenario with battery life. The important thing speaking level is the introduction of silicon-carbon battery tech, and Dimensity 9400-powered gadgets have a transparent edge in the case of battery life. Whereas the OnePlus 13 and Vivo X200 Professional have an identical 6000mAh cells, the X200 Professional managed to last more in my testing, delivering an extra hour of screen-on-time.

I did not do any quantitative battery testing, however my utilization throughout gadgets is roughly unchanged, and the 2 telephones that delivered the most effective battery life are the X200 Professional and Discover X8 Professional, each powered by the Dimensity 9400. Finally, each Qualcomm and MediaTek did a standout job with their 2025 designs, and whereas MediaTek is seeing higher design wins, Qualcomm continues to dominate the North American market. I do not see that establishment altering anytime quickly, however what’s refreshing is that MediaTek has a viable various within the Dimensity 9400 in different international markets.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles