
Amazon Textract is AWS’s machine studying service that reads and processes paperwork robotically. It does extra than simply flip photos into textual content like primary OCR instruments. You need to use it to tug knowledge from varieties and tables, course of each typed and handwritten textual content, work with PDFs and scanned photos, and deal with paperwork in a number of languages. It even comes with ready-to-use instruments for particular paperwork like invoices, IDs, and lending paperwork.
Our evaluation of real-world implementations exhibits Textract’s clear strengths and limitations. It excels at processing structured monetary paperwork and varieties inside the AWS ecosystem. The pricing begins at $1.50 per 1,000 pages for primary textual content extraction, scaling up for specialised doc varieties like invoices or lending paperwork.
Then again, the analysis additionally revealed that the platform falls quick on the subject of:
➡️
1. Accuracy when processing handwritten textual content
2. Prices that scale poorly for giant volumes
3. Advanced doc layouts and non-standard formatting
4. Desk extraction with superior formatting
5. Setup requiring AWS experience and ongoing upkeep
Let us take a look at the highest Textract alternate options that can assist you decide the suitable device on your doc processing wants.
A quick comparability of Amazon Textract alternate options
At Nanonets, we course of thousands and thousands of paperwork month-to-month for over 500 enterprises, together with 35% of Fortune 500 corporations. This offers us distinctive insights into what works (and what does not) in doc processing. We have seen firsthand how companies wrestle to seek out the suitable doc processing answer, particularly when evaluating Amazon Textract alternate options.
For the aim of this comparability, we evaluated Textract alternate options based mostly on:
- Actual efficiency knowledge from processing thousands and thousands of paperwork
- Direct suggestions from enterprise purchasers who switched platforms
- Unbiased consumer critiques from G2, Capterra, Gartner, and TrustRadius
- Arms-on testing by our doc processing consultants
Comparative desk: Prime 10 Amazon Textract alternate options
Sr No. | Product | Principal characteristic | G2 score | Free trial | Pricing | Complete rating* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Amazon Textract | AWS-native doc processing | 4.4/5 | No | Pay-as-you-go ($1.50 per 1,000 pages) | 43.4 |
2 | Nanonets | Finish-to-end automation with 98% accuracy | 4.8/5 | Sure (500 pages) | Pay-as-you-go, First 500 pages free | 46.5 |
3 | Rossum | Cognitive knowledge seize | 4.4/5 | No | Customized pricing | 43.8 |
4 | Docparser | Rule-based extraction | 4.6/5 | Sure | Begins at $39/month | 44.0 |
5 | Azure DI | Enterprise integration | 4.5/5 | Sure | Pay-as-you-go | 43.2 |
6 | Google Cloud Doc AI | ML-powered processing | 4.2/5 | Sure | Pay-as-you-go | 43.2 |
7 | ABBYY FlexiCapture | Superior OCR capabilities | 4.1/5 | No | Begins at $4,150 (one-time) | 44.3 |
8 | Tungsten Seize | Excessive-volume doc scanning | 4.3/5 | Sure | Customized pricing | 43.0 |
9 | Laserfiche | Enterprise content material administration | 4.7/5 | Sure | Begins at $50/consumer/yr | 43.9 |
10 | Hyperscience | Human-in-loop workflows | 4.6/5 | No | Customized pricing | 46.3 |
(*Consult with scoring methodology on the backside)
Now, let’s study every various intimately to know their particular strengths, limitations, and very best use circumstances. We’ll analyze how they examine to Textract and allow you to decide which answer most closely fits your doc processing wants.
1. Nanonets
Nanonets is an AI-powered doc processing platform that goes past primary OCR to supply end-to-end automation. In contrast to Textract’s template-based strategy, we use deep studying to know doc context and adapt to new layouts robotically. Our platform combines OCR, pure language processing, and machine studying to deal with all the pieces from knowledge extraction to workflow automation.
💡
Key options:
1. Clever doc classification and routing
2. Automated knowledge validation and error checking
3. Customized mannequin coaching with as few as 10 samples
4. Pre-built fashions for invoices, receipts, IDs
5. Multi-stage approval workflows
6. Database matching for knowledge verification
7. Automated export to accounting programs
8. Webhook and API integrations
9. Constructed-in human verification instruments
Execs of Nanonets | Cons of Nanonets |
---|---|
Template-free processing with self-learning fashions | Greater value for low volumes |
Helps 40+ languages | Preliminary mannequin coaching requires time |
Pre-trained fashions for widespread paperwork | Studying curve for advanced workflows |
Intensive integration capabilities | UI may be overwhelming at first |
Robust workflow automation capabilities | |
Constructed-in verification and approval flows | |
Strong API documentation and assist | |
Common mannequin enhancements from corrections |
Pricing: Free tier obtainable for first 500 pages. Professional plan begins at $999/month for 10,000 pages.
Greatest fitted to: Mid to giant organizations in finance, healthcare, logistics, and manufacturing sectors processing various doc varieties.
How does Nanonets examine to Amazon Textract?
Parameter | Nanonets | Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use | 9.3 | 8.9 |
Ease of Setup | 9.1 | 8.9 |
High quality of Help | 9.4 | 8.6 |
Meets Necessities | 9.1 | 8.8 |
Product Path (% optimistic) | 9.6 | 8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Nanonet if you happen to’re on the lookout for self-learning fashions, in depth workflow automation, and built-in verification instruments to automate your doc processing workflow end-to-end. Nanonets will help you deal with various doc layouts and a number of languages or guarantee seamless knowledge move along with your current enterprise programs.
2. Rossum

Rossum’s strategy to doc processing entails utilizing cognitive knowledge seize as a substitute of conventional template-based extraction. The platform combines AI-powered understanding with in depth workflow automation to deal with the whole doc lifecycle – from receiving to processing to integration with enterprise programs.
💡
Key options:
1. Cognitive knowledge seize with out templates
2. Multi-channel doc receiving
3. Constructed-in exception dealing with workflow
4. Intensive validation guidelines engine
5. Enterprise-grade integrations
6. Customized subject validation
7. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 licensed
8. Two-way communication for exceptions
Execs of Rossum | Cons of Rossum |
---|---|
No templates wanted for brand spanking new layouts | Greater value for low volumes |
Higher dealing with of advanced paperwork | System glitches throughout updates |
Robust enterprise-grade assist | Slower processing of enormous PDFs |
Constructed-in exception administration | Steeper studying curve initially |
Intensive validation capabilities | Advanced API for tax buildings |
Common AI enhancements | Restricted Excel assist |
Versatile customization choices | |
Strong safety compliance |
Pricing: Enterprise-focused pricing with customized quotes based mostly on quantity. Contains SLA ensures and devoted assist.
Greatest fitted to: Organizations throughout manufacturing, retail, and monetary providers that want complete doc automation. Rossum notably excels in AP departments and shared service facilities processing various vendor paperwork.
How does Rossum examine to Amazon Textract?
Parameter | Rossum | Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use | 8.5 | 8.9 |
Ease of Setup | 8.0 | 8.9 |
High quality of Help | 9.2 | 8.6 |
Meets Necessities | 8.3 | 8.8 |
Product Path (% optimistic) | 9.8 | 8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Rossum if it is advisable to course of various doc varieties with robust validation and compliance controls. The platform notably shines in accounts payable automation and vendor doc processing the place template upkeep could be impractical.
3. Docparser

Docparser gives a rule-based strategy utilizing zonal OCR expertise. Whereas Textract makes use of machine studying to know paperwork, Docparser enables you to outline precisely how and the place to extract knowledge utilizing customizable parsing guidelines.
💡
Key options:
1. Customizable zonal OCR extraction
2. Superior desk parsing capabilities
3. Good doc routing system
4. Pre-built parsing templates
5. Automated knowledge formatting
6. Multi-format doc assist
7. Intensive API entry
Execs of Docparser | Cons of Docparser |
---|---|
Extra exact extraction management | Requires guide rule setup |
Higher with constant layouts | Restricted AI capabilities |
Stronger desk extraction | Studying curve for setup |
Extra inexpensive for low volumes | One language at a time |
Easier integration choices | Template upkeep wanted |
Fast processing pace | Not very best for various layouts |
Glorious buyer assist | |
Clear pricing construction |
Pricing: Clear tiered pricing beginning at $39/month for 100 paperwork. Marketing strategy at $159/month for 1,000 paperwork. Enterprise plans obtainable.
Greatest fitted to: Small to mid-sized companies processing constant doc codecs, particularly in finance and operations.
How does Docparser examine to Amazon Textract?
Parameter | Docparser | Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use | 9.0 | 8.9 |
Ease of Setup | 8.8 | 8.9 |
High quality of Help | 8.9 | 8.6 |
Meets Necessities | 8.7 | 8.8 |
Product Path (% optimistic) | 8.5 | 8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Docparser if you happen to want granular management over extraction guidelines and work primarily with structured paperwork. Its rule-based strategy makes it very best for automated workflows the place paperwork have predictable codecs and also you want exact desk extraction. The platform gives higher worth for smaller doc volumes and gives extra easy integration choices.
4. Azure AI Doc Intelligence

Azure AI Doc Intelligence is a part of Microsoft’s cloud platform, Azure, which gives over 200 cloud providers for companies. It represents Microsoft’s enterprise-focused strategy to doc processing, providing processing capabilities that run each within the cloud and by yourself servers. You’ll be able to deploy it by means of containers that fit your particular knowledge storage and processing location necessities.
💡
Key options:
1. Basic doc evaluation (learn/structure)
2. Pre-built enterprise doc fashions
3. Customized neural mannequin coaching
4. Doc classification
5. Container-based deployment
6. Azure service integration
7. Constructed-in validation guidelines
8. Multi-language assist
9. Human evaluate workflows
Execs of Azure DI | Cons of Azure DI |
---|---|
On-premises deployment possibility | Advanced preliminary configuration |
Pre-built enterprise fashions | Requires technical experience |
Robust Azure integration | Studying curve for superior options |
Customized neural fashions | Updates may cause disruptions |
Doc classification | Value administration complexity |
Container assist | Documentation gaps |
Enterprise safety | |
A number of deployment selections |
Pricing: Pay-as-you-go based mostly on pages processed. Free tier consists of 500 pages month-to-month. Enterprise pricing obtainable for prime volumes.
Greatest fitted to: Enterprises throughout healthcare, finance, and authorities sectors that have to course of paperwork within the cloud and on their servers.
How does Azure Kind Recognizer examine to Amazon Textract?
Parameter | Azure DI | Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use | 8.5 | 8.9 |
Ease of Setup | 8.0 | 8.9 |
High quality of Help | 8.5 | 8.6 |
Meets Necessities | 9.0 | 8.8 |
Product Path (% optimistic) | 9.2 | 8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Azure Doc Intelligence while you want extra management over the place your doc processing occurs. It might even be a sensible choice if you happen to already use Microsoft providers.
5. Google Cloud Doc AI

Doc AI represents Google’s enterprise strategy to doc processing. A part of the corporate’s cloud division, it combines OCR, pure language processing, and machine studying to rework unstructured paperwork into actionable knowledge. It gives an end-to-end platform for doc processing, evaluation, and storage.
💡
Key options:
1. Basic doc processors (OCR, splitter, parser)
2. Pre-built enterprise processors
3. Doc AI Workbench for customized fashions
4. Doc AI Warehouse for storage
5. Human-in-loop evaluate capabilities
6. Built-in processing console
7. Multi-language assist
8. Batch processing limitations
9. API-first structure
Execs of Doc AI | Cons of Doc AI |
---|---|
Intensive pre-built processors | Restricted batch processing |
Robust ML/AI capabilities | Advanced pricing construction |
Built-in storage answer | Requires technical experience |
Human evaluate workflows | Greater studying curve |
Google Cloud integration | Enterprise-focused pricing |
Common mannequin enhancements | Documentation gaps |
Robust OCR accuracy | |
Versatile deployment |
Pricing: Pay-as-you-go based mostly on doc processing quantity. Free tier obtainable for testing. Enterprise pricing obtainable for prime volumes.
Greatest fitted to: Enterprises processing various doc varieties at scale, particularly people who require advanced evaluation. If an integration with Google Cloud is smart to your corporation.
How does Google Cloud Doc AI examine to Amazon Textract?
Parameter | Google Cloud Doc AI | Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use | 8.7 | 8.9 |
Ease of Setup | 8.5 | 8.9 |
High quality of Help | 8.0 | 8.6 |
Meets Necessities | 8.8 | 8.8 |
Product Path (% optimistic) | 9.2 | 8.2 |
➡️
6. ABBYY FlexiCapture

ABBYY FlexiCapture is a strong clever doc processing platform that automates the seize, classification, and knowledge extraction from all kinds of doc varieties and codecs. In contrast to Textract’s cloud-only mannequin, FlexiCapture gives each on-premises and cloud deployment choices, making it appropriate for organizations with strict knowledge safety and compliance necessities.
💡
Key options:
1. Superior OCR for structured and unstructured paperwork
2. AI-based knowledge seize and extraction
3. Clever doc classification and separation
4. Scalable batch processing for prime volumes
5. Customizable enterprise guidelines and validation
6. Multi-channel enter (scanner, electronic mail, fax, cell)
7. Seamless integration with BPM, RPA, and ECM programs
8. Versatile deployment choices (on-premises, cloud, hybrid)
9. Multi-language assist
Execs of FlexiCapture | Cons of FlexiCapture |
---|---|
Extremely correct knowledge extraction | Advanced setup and configuration |
Handles various doc codecs | Steep studying curve |
Scalable for high-volume processing | Greater upfront funding |
Strong integration capabilities | Requires specialised IT expertise to take care of |
Versatile deployment choices | |
Robust compliance and security measures |
Pricing: Based mostly on the variety of pages processed yearly, with the associated fee per web page lowering as quantity will increase. On-premises and cloud-based pricing fashions can be found, with on-premises requiring a better upfront funding however decrease ongoing prices. Precise pricing will not be publicly disclosed.
Greatest fitted to: Enterprises and organizations with high-volume doc processing wants and strict compliance necessities, like healthcare, finance, and authorities.
How does ABBYY FlexiCapture examine to Amazon Textract?
Parameter | ABBYY FlexiCapture | Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use | 8.8 | 8.9 |
Ease of Setup | 8.0 | 8.9 |
High quality of Help | 8.5 | 8.6 |
Meets Necessities | 9.0 | 8.8 |
Product Path (% optimistic) | 10.0 | 8.2 |
➡️
7. Tungsten Seize (previously Kofax Seize)

Tungsten Seize is a doc scanning and knowledge extraction answer that automates the conversion of paper paperwork into digital knowledge. It focuses on high-volume doc scanning, OCR, and knowledge seize.
💡
Key options:
1. Superior doc scanning and picture processing
2. Clever doc separation and classification
3. Automated knowledge extraction utilizing OCR and ICR
4. VRS (VirtualReScan) expertise for picture enhancement
5. Integration with different Tungsten Modules for superior knowledge extraction
6. Help for a variety of scanners and multi-function units
7. Scalable structure for high-volume processing
8. Batch processing and workflow automation capabilities
9. Centralized administration and monitoring
Execs of Tungsten Seize | Cons of Tungsten Seize |
---|---|
Extremely correct OCR and knowledge extraction | Advanced setup and configuration |
Handles various doc varieties and codecs | Steep studying curve |
Highly effective picture enhancement with VRS | Greater upfront prices |
Scalable for high-volume processing | Requires on-premises infrastructure |
Intensive customization choices | Restricted out-of-the-box integrations |
Mature and confirmed expertise | Older consumer interface design |
Pricing: Pricing is predicated on the variety of pages scanned yearly, with quantity reductions obtainable. Extra prices might apply for add-on modules, skilled providers, and upkeep. Precise pricing will not be publicly disclosed, but it surely usually entails a big upfront funding and ongoing upkeep charges.
Greatest fitted to: Organizations with high-volume, centralized doc scanning necessities, equivalent to shared service facilities, BPOs, and huge enterprises with devoted scanning departments.
How does Tungsten Seize examine to Amazon Textract?
Parameter | Tungsten Seize | Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use | 8.5 | 8.9 |
Ease of Setup | 8.0 | 8.9 |
High quality of Help | 8.7 | 8.6 |
Meets Necessities | 8.8 | 8.8 |
Product Path (% optimistic) | 9.0 | 8.2 |
➡️
8. Laserfiche

Laserfiche is a complete enterprise content material administration (ECM) and enterprise course of automation platform that features strong doc seize and processing capabilities. It gives an end-to-end answer that mixes clever doc seize, safe storage, workflow automation, and information administration.
💡
Key options:
1. Clever doc seize and classification
2. Workflow designer for course of automation
3. Digital varieties and digital signatures
4. Doc administration and model management
5. Information administration and retention insurance policies
6. Safe doc storage and entry management
7. Cell doc seize and entry
8. Varied integration choices and APIs
Execs | Cons |
---|---|
Complete content material administration | Greater upfront prices |
Highly effective workflow automation | Steeper studying curve |
Robust safety and compliance | Requires IT assets to implement and preserve |
Extremely customizable and extensible | Might require skilled providers for advanced implementations |
Scalable for enterprise deployments | |
Deep integration with enterprise programs |
Pricing: Presents each on-premises and cloud-based deployment choices, with pricing based mostly on the variety of customers and particular modules required. You may get a free trial for its cloud-based answer.
Greatest fitted to: Organizations throughout industries, notably these with advanced doc administration and compliance necessities, equivalent to authorities companies, instructional establishments, monetary providers corporations, and healthcare suppliers.
How does Laserfiche examine to Amazon Textract?
Parameter | Laserfiche | Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use | 8.8 | 8.9 |
Ease of Setup | 8.0 | 8.9 |
High quality of Help | 8.9 | 8.6 |
Meets Necessities | 9.0 | 8.8 |
Product Path (% optimistic) | 9.2 | 8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Laserfiche if you happen to want a complete answer that mixes doc processing with doc administration, workflow automation, and information administration. It is notably precious while you want robust safety, compliance, and auditing capabilities alongside doc seize.
9. Hyperscience

Hyperscience is an clever doc processing platform that mixes AI, ML, and human-in-the-loop workflows to automate knowledge extraction, classification, and validation. It gives an end-to-end answer that handles advanced, variable, and low-quality paperwork with excessive accuracy and automation charges.
💡
Key options:
1. AI-powered knowledge extraction and classification
2. Help for structured, semi-structured, and unstructured paperwork
3. ICR for handwritten textual content and low-quality photos
4. Human-in-the-loop workflows for exception dealing with and validation
5. Customizable workflows and integration with current programs
6. Steady studying and mannequin enchancment
7. Safe and compliant infrastructure
Execs of Hyperscience | Cons of Hyperscience |
---|---|
Excessive accuracy and automation charges | Greater value in comparison with standalone options |
Handles advanced, variable, and low-quality paperwork | Longer preliminary setup and configuration |
Human-in-the-loop workflows for exception dealing with | Might require important coaching knowledge for customized fashions |
Integration with enterprise programs | |
Steady studying and enchancment | |
Devoted buyer success staff and assist |
Pricing: Presents customized pricing.
Greatest fitted to: Enterprises with advanced, high-volume doc processing wants, notably these coping with variable, unstructured, or low-quality paperwork. Industries equivalent to monetary providers, insurance coverage, healthcare, and authorities might be able to automate claims processing, account opening, and bill processing, with excessive accuracy and effectivity.
How does Hyperscience examine to Amazon Textract?
Parameter | Hyperscience | Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use | 9.3 | 8.9 |
Ease of Setup | 9.0 | 8.9 |
High quality of Help | 9.1 | 8.6 |
Meets Necessities | 9.1 | 8.8 |
Product Path (% optimistic) | 9.8 | 8.2 |
➡️
How to decide on the perfect Amazon Textract various?
When you’re contemplating shifting away from Amazon Textract, your selection will rely upon a number of key components we have recognized from analyzing tons of of consumer experiences and implementation circumstances.
Scoring methodology*
We have evaluated every various throughout 5 key parameters that matter most to organizations switching from Textract:
- Ease of use: How rapidly groups can begin utilizing the device with out in depth AWS experience
- Ease of setup: Implementation effort, particularly in comparison with Textract’s AWS-centric setup
- High quality of assist: Availability and responsiveness of assist, a standard ache level with Textract
- Meets necessities: Capability to deal with doc processing wants past Textract’s capabilities
- Product route: Steady enchancment and have improvement tempo
Product | Ease of Use | Ease of Setup | High quality of Help | Meets Necessities | Product Path | Complete Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amazon Textract | 8.9 | 8.9 | 8.6 | 8.8 | 8.2 | 43.4 |
Nanonets | 9.3 | 9.1 | 9.4 | 9.1 | 9.6 | 46.5 |
Rossum | 8.5 | 8.0 | 9.2 | 8.3 | 9.8 | 43.8 |
Docparser | 9.0 | 8.8 | 8.9 | 8.7 | 8.5 | 44.0 |
Azure DI | 8.5 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 9.0 | 9.2 | 43.2 |
Google Cloud Doc AI | 8.7 | 8.5 | 8.0 | 8.8 | 9.2 | 43.2 |
ABBYY FlexiCapture | 8.8 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 9.0 | 10.0 | 44.3 |
Tungsten Seize | 8.5 | 8.0 | 8.7 | 8.8 | 9.0 | 43.0 |
Laserfiche | 8.8 | 8.0 | 8.9 | 9.0 | 9.2 | 43.9 |
Hyperscience | 9.3 | 9.0 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 9.8 | 46.3 |
Key choice components
Based mostly on widespread challenges organizations face with Textract, think about these points:
Doc complexity necessities
- Do you want higher handwriting recognition than Textract gives?
- Are you processing advanced tables or varieties?
- Do it is advisable to deal with a number of languages successfully?
AWS dependency concerns
- How tightly built-in are you with AWS providers?
- Would a cloud-agnostic answer provide extra flexibility?
- Do you want on-premises deployment choices?
Value construction preferences
- Is Textract’s per-page pricing mannequin working on your quantity?
- Do you want extra predictable pricing?
- What’s your month-to-month doc processing quantity?
Integration wants
- Past AWS providers, what programs want to attach?
- Do you want pre-built connectors to widespread enterprise instruments?
- How vital is API flexibility?
Automation necessities
- Do you want workflow automation capabilities?
- Is batch processing vital on your use case?
- Do you require human-in-the-loop options?
💡
– Characteristic units and capabilities might have modified
– Pricing fashions would possibly differ from what’s listed
– Efficiency metrics may differ based mostly in your particular use case
– Integration choices might have expanded
– New options might have been added
We suggest reaching out to distributors straight for probably the most present data and testing any answer completely along with your precise paperwork earlier than making a choice.
Whereas industrial options provide complete options and assist, organizations with technical assets or monetary constrainst might also think about open-source alternate options for doc processing.
Tesseract OCR, maintained by Google, is without doubt one of the most established open-source OCR engines obtainable. An alternative choice is EasyOCR, which gives a Python library for OCR with assist for handwriting recognition and a number of languages.
Nevertheless, not like the industrial alternate options mentioned above, open-source options usually require important technical experience to implement and preserve and infrequently want extra improvement work to match options like kind subject extraction, desk evaluation, and workflow automation that come normal with industrial platforms.
FAQs
What’s the distinction between ABBYY and Textract?
ABBYY FlexiCapture is a complete doc processing platform that features superior OCR, workflow automation, and enterprise integration capabilities. It gives each cloud and on-premises deployment choices. Amazon Textract, compared, is a cloud-only service centered particularly on knowledge extraction and doc evaluation, built-in with AWS providers.
What’s the distinction between OCR and Textract?
OCR (Optical Character Recognition) is a expertise that converts photos of textual content into machine-readable textual content. Amazon Textract goes past primary OCR through the use of machine studying to not solely acknowledge textual content but in addition perceive doc construction, extract kind fields, and analyze tables robotically. Whereas OCR merely converts textual content, Textract gives structured knowledge output and understanding of doc relationships.
Amazon Textract is a machine studying service that robotically extracts textual content, handwriting, and knowledge from scanned paperwork. It is a part of AWS’s AI providers, designed to course of paperwork at scale with out guide intervention. The service can establish and extract knowledge from varieties and tables whereas sustaining the unique doc’s construction and relationships.
Can Textract extract photos?
Textract processes photos to extract textual content and knowledge from them, but it surely does not extract photos themselves. It may possibly analyze photos containing paperwork, varieties, tables, and handwritten textual content, however its goal is to extract textual data and knowledge fairly than picture content material.