16.8 C
New York
Saturday, June 14, 2025

How Nexthink constructed real-time alerts with Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink


This submit is cowritten with Nikos Tragaras and Raphaël Afanyan from Nexthink.

On this submit, we describe Nexthink’s journey as they carried out a brand new real-time alerting system utilizing Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink. We discover the structure, the rationale behind key expertise decisions, and the Amazon Internet Providers (AWS) providers that enabled a scalable and environment friendly answer.

Nexthink is a pioneering chief in digital worker expertise (DEX). With a mission to empower IT groups and elevate office productiveness, Nexthink’s Infinity platform affords real-time visibility into finish person environments, actionable insights, and sturdy automation capabilities. By combining real-time analytics, proactive monitoring, and clever automation, Infinity permits organizations to ship an optimum digital workspace.

Up to now 5 years, Nexthink accomplished its transformation right into a fully-fledged cloud platform that processes trillions of occasions per day, reaching over 5 GB per second of aggregated throughput. Internally, Infinity contains greater than 300 microservices that use the ability of Apache Kafka by Amazon Managed Service for Apache Kafka (Amazon MSK) for knowledge ingestion and intra-service communication. The Nexthink ecosystem contains a number of lots of of Micronaut-based Java microservices deployed in Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS). The overwhelming majority of microservices work together with Kafka by the Kafka Streams framework.

Nexthink alerting system

That will help you perceive Nexthink’s journey towards a brand new real-time alerting answer, we start by inspecting the prevailing system and the evolving necessities that led them to hunt a brand new answer.

Nexthink’s present alerting system gives close to real-time notifications, serving to customers detect and reply to crucial occasions rapidly. Whereas efficient, this method has limitations in scalability, flexibility, and real-time processing capabilities.

Nexthink gathers telemetry knowledge from hundreds of shoppers’ laptops overlaying CPU utilization, reminiscence, software program variations, community efficiency, and extra. Amazon MSK and ClickHouse function the spine for this knowledge pipeline. All endpoint knowledge is ingested in Kafka multi-tenant subjects, that are processed and eventually saved in a ClickHouse database.

Utilizing the present alerting system, shoppers can outline monitoring guidelines in Nexthink Question Language (NQL), that are evaluated in close to actual time by polling the database each quarter-hour. Alerts are triggered when anomalies are detected towards client-defined thresholds or long-term baselines. This course of is illustrated within the following structure diagram.

Initially, database-polling allowed nice flexibility within the analysis of complicated alerts. Nonetheless, this method positioned heavy stress on the database. As the corporate grew and supported bigger clients with extra endpoints and screens, the database skilled more and more heavy masses.

Evolution to a brand new use-case: Actual-time alerts

As Nexthink expanded its knowledge assortment to incorporate digital desktop infrastructure (VDI), the necessity for real-time alerting grew to become much more crucial. In contrast to conventional endpoints, comparable to laptops, the place occasions are gathered each 5 minutes, VDI knowledge is ingested each 30 seconds—considerably growing the amount and frequency of knowledge. The prevailing structure relied on database polling to judge alerts, operating at a 15-minute interval. This method was insufficient for the brand new VDI use case, the place alerts wanted to be evaluated in close to actual time on messages arriving each 30 seconds. Merely growing the polling frequency wasn’t a viable possibility as a result of it will place extreme load on the database, resulting in efficiency bottlenecks and scalability challenges. To satisfy these new calls for effectively, we shifted to real-time alert analysis instantly on Kafka subjects.

Expertise choices

As we evaluated options for our real-time alerting system, we analyzed two major expertise choices: Apache Kafka Streams and Apache Flink. Every possibility had advantages and limitations that wanted to be thought-about.

All Nexthink microservices as much as that time built-in with Kafka utilizing Apache Kafka Streams. We’ve noticed in observe a number of advantages:

  • Light-weight and seamless integration. No want for added infrastructure.
  • Low latency utilizing RocksDB as a neighborhood key-value retailer.
  • Staff experience. Nexthink groups have been writing microservices with Kafka-streams for a very long time and really feel very comfy utilizing it.

In some use circumstances nevertheless, we discovered that there have been vital limitations:

  • Scalability – Scalability was constrained by the tight coupling between parallelism of microservices and the variety of partitions in Kafka subjects. Many microservices had already scaled out to match the partition depend of the subjects they consumed, limiting their skill to scale additional. One potential answer was growing the partition depend. Nonetheless, this method launched important operational overhead, particularly with microservices consuming subjects owned by different domains. It required rebalancing all the Kafka cluster and wanted coordination throughout a number of groups. Moreover, such modifications impacted downstream providers, requiring cautious reconfiguration of stateful processing. The choice method could be to introduce intermediate subjects to redistribute workload, however this might add complexity to the info pipeline and enhance useful resource consumption on Kafka. These challenges made it clear {that a} extra versatile and scalable method was wanted.
  • State administration – Providers that wanted to create massive Ok-tables in reminiscence had an elevated startup time. Additionally, in circumstances the place the interior state was massive in quantity, we discovered that it utilized important load to the Kafka cluster in the course of the creation of the interior state.
  • Late occasion processing – In windowing operations, late occasions needed to be managed manually with methods that complexified the codebase.

In search of another that might assist us overcome the challenges posed by our present system, we determined to judge Flink. Its sturdy streaming capabilities, scalability, and suppleness made it a wonderful alternative for constructing real-time alerting techniques primarily based on Kafka subjects. A number of benefits made Flink significantly interesting:

  • Native integration with Kafka – Flink affords native connectors for Kafka, which is a central part within the Nexthink ecosystem.
  • Occasion-time processing and help for late occasions – Flink permits messages to be processed primarily based on the occasion time (that’s, when the occasion really occurred) even when they arrive out of order. This characteristic is essential for real-time alerts as a result of it ensures their accuracy.
  • Scalability – Flink’s distributed structure permits it to scale horizontally independently from the variety of partitions within the Kafka subjects. This characteristic weighed rather a lot in our decision-making as a result of the dependence on the variety of partitions was a robust limitation in our platform up thus far.
  • Fault tolerance – Flink helps checkpoints, permitting managed state to be persevered and guaranteeing constant restoration in case of failures. In contrast to Kafka Streams, which depends on Kafka itself for long-term state persistence (including further load to the cluster), Flink’s checkpointing mechanism operates independently and runs out-of-band, minimizing the affect on Kafka whereas offering environment friendly state administration.
  • Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink – Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink is a totally managed service that simplifies the deployment, scaling, and administration of Flink functions for real-time knowledge processing. By eliminating the operational complexities of managing Flink clusters, AWS permits organizations to give attention to constructing and operating real-time analytics and event-driven functions effectively. Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink supplied us with important flexibility. It streamlined our analysis course of, which meant we might rapidly arrange a proof-of-concept surroundings with out entering into the complexities of managing an inner Flink cluster. Furthermore, by decreasing the overhead of cluster administration, it made Flink a viable expertise alternative and accelerated our supply timeline.

Resolution

After cautious analysis of each choices, we selected Apache Flink as our answer because of its superior scalability, sturdy event-time processing, and environment friendly state administration capabilities. Right here’s how we carried out our new real-time alerting system.

The next diagram is the answer structure.

The primary use case was to detect points with VDI. Nonetheless, our intention was to construct a generic answer that will give us the choice to onboard sooner or later present use circumstances at present carried out by polling. We needed to take care of a standard approach of configuring monitoring circumstances and permit alert analysis each with polling in addition to in actual time, relying on the kind of system being monitored.

This answer contains a number of components:

  • Monitor configuration – Utilizing Nexthink Question Language (NQL), the alerts administrator defines a monitor that specifies, for instance:
    • Knowledge supply – VDI occasions
    • Time window – Each 30 seconds
    • Metric – Common community latency, grouped by desktop pool
    • Set off situation(s) – Latency exceeding 300 ms for a continuous interval of 5 minutes

This monitor configuration is then saved in an internally developed doc retailer and propagated downstream in a Kafka matter.

  • Knowledge processing utilizing Generic Stream Providers– The Nexthink Collector, an agent put in on endpoints, captures and studies varied sorts of actions from the VDI endpoints the place it’s put in. These occasions are forwarded to Amazon MSK in considered one of Nexthink’s manufacturing digital non-public clouds (VPCs) and are consumed by Java microservices operating on Amazon EKS belonging to a number of domains inside Nexthink

Certainly one of them is Generic Stream Providers, a system that processes the collected occasions and aggregates them in buckets of 30 seconds. This part works as self-service for all of the characteristic groups in Nexthink and may question and combination knowledge from an NQL question. This manner, we have been capable of preserve a unified person expertise on monitor configuration utilizing NQL, no matter how alerts have been evaluated. This part is damaged down into two providers:

    • GS processor – Consumes uncooked VDI session occasions and applies preliminary processing
    • GS aggregator – Teams and aggregates the info in keeping with the monitor configuration
  • Actual-time monitoring utilizing Flink – Static threshold alerting and seasonal change detection, which identifies variations in knowledge that observe a recurring sample over time, are the 2 sorts of detection that we provide for VDI points. The system splits the processing between two functions:
    • Baseline software – Calculates statistical baselines with seasonality utilizing time-of-day anomaly algorithm. For instance, the latency by VDI shopper location or the CPU queue size of a desktop pool.
    • Alert software – Generates alerts primarily based on user-defined thresholds when the surprising values don’t change over time or dynamic thresholds primarily based on baselines, which set off when a metric deviates from an anticipated sample.

The next diagram illustrates how we be a part of VDI metrics with monitor configurations, combination knowledge utilizing sliding time home windows, and consider threshold guidelines, all inside Apache Flink. From this course of, alerts are generated and are then grouped and filtered earlier than being processed additional by the customers of alerts.

  • Alert processing and notifications – After an alert is triggered (when a threshold is exceeded) or recovered (when a metric returns to regular ranges), the system will assess their affect to prioritize response by the affect processing module. Alerts are then consumed by notification providers that ship messages by emails or webhooks. The alert and affect knowledge are then ingested right into a time collection database.

Advantages of the brand new structure

One of many key benefits of adopting a streaming-based method over polling was its ease of configuration and administration, particularly for a small group of three engineers. There was no want for cluster administration, so all we would have liked to do was to provision the service and begin coding.

Given our prior expertise with Kafka and Kafka Streams and mixed with the simplicity of a managed service, we have been capable of rapidly develop and deploy a brand new alerting system with out the overhead of complicated infrastructure setup. We used Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink to spin up a proof of idea inside just a few hours, which meant the group might give attention to defining the enterprise logic with out having considerations associated to cluster administration.

Initially, we have been involved concerning the challenges of becoming a member of a number of Kafka subjects. With our earlier Kafka Streams implementation, joined subjects required similar partition keys, a constraint referred to as co-partitioning. This created an rigid structure, significantly when integrating subjects throughout totally different enterprise domains. Every area naturally had its personal optimum partitioning technique, forcing tough compromises.

Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink solved this downside by its inner knowledge partitioning capabilities. Though Flink nonetheless incurs some community site visitors when redistributing knowledge throughout the cluster throughout joins, the overhead is virtually negligible. The ensuing structure is each extra scalable (as a result of subjects may be scaled independently primarily based on their particular throughput necessities) and simpler to take care of with out complicated partition alignment considerations.

This considerably improved our skill to detect and reply to VDI efficiency degradations in actual time whereas preserving our structure clear and environment friendly.

Classes learnt

As with every new expertise, adopting Flink for real-time processing got here with its personal set of challenges and insights.

One of many main difficulties we encountered was observing Flink’s inner state. In contrast to Kafka Streams, the place the interior state is by default backed by a Kafka matter from which its content material may be visualized, Flink’s structure makes it inherently tough to examine what is occurring inside a operating job. This required us to spend money on sturdy logging and monitoring methods to raised perceive what is occurring in the course of the execution and debug points successfully.

One other crucial perception emerged round late occasion dealing with—particularly, managing occasions with timestamps that fall inside a time-window’s boundaries however arrive after that window has closed. Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink addresses this problem by its built-in watermarking mechanism. A watermark is a timestamp-based threshold that signifies when Flink ought to take into account all occasions earlier than a particular time to have arrived. This permits the system to make knowledgeable selections about when to course of time-based operations like window aggregations. Watermarks stream by the streaming pipeline, enabling Flink to trace the progress of occasion time processing even with out-of-order occasions.

Though watermarks present a mechanism to handle late knowledge, they introduce challenges when coping with a number of enter streams working at totally different speeds. Watermarks work nicely when processing occasions from a single supply however can turn into problematic when becoming a member of streams with various velocities. It’s because they will result in unintended delays or untimely knowledge discards. For instance, a gradual stream can maintain again processing throughout all the pipeline, and an idle stream may trigger untimely window closing. Our implementation required cautious tuning of watermark methods and allowable lateness parameters to steadiness processing timeliness with knowledge completeness.

Our transition from Kafka Streams to Apache Flink proved smoother than initially anticipated. Groups with Java backgrounds and prior expertise with Kafka Streams discovered Flink’s programming mannequin intuitive and straightforward to make use of. The DataStream API affords acquainted ideas and patterns, and Flink’s extra superior options could possibly be adopted incrementally as wanted. This gradual studying curve gave our builders the pliability to turn into productive rapidly, focusing first on core stream processing duties earlier than transferring on to extra superior ideas like state administration and late occasion processing.

The way forward for Flink in Nexthink

Actual-time alerting is now deployed to manufacturing and obtainable to our shoppers. A serious success of this undertaking was the truth that we efficiently launched a expertise as a substitute for Kafka streams, with little or no administration necessities, assured scalability, data-management flexibility, and comparable value.

The affect on the Nexthink alerting system was important as a result of we not have a single evaluating alert by database polling. Due to this fact, we’re already assessing the timeframe for onboarding different alerting use circumstances to real-time analysis with Flink. This can alleviate database load and also will present extra accuracy on the alert triggering.

But the affect of Flink isn’t restricted to the Nexthink alerting system. We now have a confirmed production-ready various for providers which can be restricted by way of scalability because of the variety of partitions of the subjects they’re consuming. Thus, we’re actively evaluating the choice to transform extra providers to Flink to permit them to scale out extra flexibly.

Conclusion

Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink has been transformative for our real-time alerting system at Nexthink. By dealing with the complicated infrastructure administration, AWS enabled our group to deploy a complicated streaming answer in lower than a month, preserving our give attention to delivering enterprise worth somewhat than managing Flink clusters.

The capabilities of Flink have confirmed it to be greater than a substitute for Kafka Streams. It’s turn into a compelling first alternative for each new tasks and present characteristic refactoring. Windowed processing, late occasion administration, and stateful streaming operations have made complicated use circumstances remarkably simple to implement. As our growth groups proceed to discover Flink’s potential, we’re more and more assured that it’ll play a central position in Nexthink’s real-time knowledge processing structure transferring ahead.

To get began with Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink, discover the getting began assets and the hands-on workshop. To study extra about Nexthink’s broader journey with AWS, go to the weblog submit on Nexthink’s MSK-based structure.


In regards to the authors

Nikos Tragaras is a Principal Software program Architect at Nexthink with round 20 years of expertise in constructing distributed techniques, from conventional architectures to fashionable cloud-native platforms. He has labored extensively with streaming applied sciences, specializing in reliability and efficiency at scale. Enthusiastic about programming, he enjoys constructing clear options to complicated engineering issues

Raphaël Afanyan is a Software program Engineer and Tech Lead of the Alerts group at Nexthink. Through the years, he has labored on designing and scaling knowledge processing techniques and performed a key position in constructing Nexthink’s alerting platform. He now collaborates throughout groups to carry progressive product concepts to life, from backend structure to polished person interfaces.

Simone Pomata is a Senior Options Architect at AWS. He has labored enthusiastically within the tech trade for greater than 10 years. At AWS, he helps clients achieve constructing new applied sciences daily.

Subham Rakshit is a Senior Streaming Options Architect for Analytics at AWS primarily based within the UK. He works with clients to design and construct streaming architectures to allow them to get worth from analyzing their streaming knowledge. His two little daughters preserve him occupied more often than not exterior work, and he loves fixing jigsaw puzzles with them. Join with him on LinkedIn.

Lorenzo Nicora works as a Senior Streaming Options Architect at AWS, serving to clients throughout EMEA. He has been constructing cloud-centered, data-intensive techniques for over 25 years, working throughout industries each by consultancies and product corporations. He has used open supply applied sciences extensively and contributed to a number of tasks, together with Apache Flink.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles