20.7 C
New York
Tuesday, September 9, 2025

Decoding scientific papers: 1957 information to what researchers imply



Decoding scientific papers: 1957 information to what researchers imply

Basic Electrical researcher C. D. Graham wrote the next Glossary for Analysis Stories in a 1957 problem of Metallic Progress. Thanks are attributable to The Science Magpie for help with the put up and to Futility Closet for precious discussions.

It has lengthy been recognized that… I have never bothered to lookup the unique reference

… of nice theoretical and sensible significance … attention-grabbing to me

Whereas it has not been attainable to supply particular solutions to those questions … The experiments did not work out, however I figured I may a minimum of get a publication out of it

The W-Pb system was chosen as particularly appropriate to indicate the anticipated behaviour … The man within the subsequent lab had some already made up

Excessive-purity …
Very excessive purity …
Extraordinarily excessive purity …
Tremendous-purity …
Spectroscopically pure …
Composition unknown apart from the exaggerated claims of the provider

A fiducial reference line … A scratch

Three of the samples had been chosen for detailed examine … The outcomes on the others did not make sense and had been ignored

… by accident strained throughout mounting … dropped on the ground

… dealt with with excessive care all through the experiments … not dropped on the ground

Typical outcomes are proven … The very best outcomes are proven

Though some element has been misplaced in copy, it’s clear from the unique micrograph that … It’s not possible to inform from the micrograph

Presumably at longer instances … I did not take time to seek out out

The settlement with the anticipated curve is great … truthful
… good … poor
… passable … uncertain
… truthful … imaginary
… nearly as good as might be anticipated … non-existent

These outcomes will likely be reported at a later date I would probably get round to this someday

Probably the most dependable values are these of Jones He was a pupil of mine

It’s prompt that …
It’s believed that …
It might be that …
I believe

It’s typically believed that … A few different guys suppose so too

It may be argued that … I’ve such a very good reply to this objection that I shall now increase it

It’s clear that a lot further work will likely be required earlier than a whole understanding … I do not perceive it

Sadly, a quantitative principle to account for these results has not been formulated Neither does anyone else

Appropriate inside an order of magnitude Flawed

It’s to be hoped that this work will stimulate additional work within the area This paper is not superb, however neither are any of the others on this depressing topic

Thanks are attributable to Joe Glotz for help with the experiments and to John Doe for precious discussions Glotz did the work and Doe defined what it meant

Beforehand:
Scientist’s cat discovers a brand new virus, AGAIN

The put up Decoding scientific papers: 1957 information to what researchers imply appeared first on Boing Boing.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles