My 1st era iPhone SE died a couple of 12 months in the past. My 1-year new third era SE has many extra Contacts lists than I anticipate. Aside from “All Contacts”, I see 5 lists.
On the very prime, I see:
Underneath iPhone, I see:
- (1) All iPhone
- (2) iPhone World Deal with Checklist
Underneath AkrutoSync Change, I see:
- (3) All AkrutoSync Change
- (4) AkrutoSync Change World Deal with Checklist
Underneath iCloud, I see:
I assume that (0) combines all lists? It is the solely listing wherein I see duplicate entries.
Is (1) supposed to mix all lists underneath the iPhone part? There is just one different listing, so meaning “All iPhone” is equivalent to “iPhone World Deal with Checklist.
Equally, is (3) supposed to mix all lists underneath the AkrutoSync Change part? Once more, there is just one different listing, in order that signifies that “All AkrutoSync Change” is equivalent to “AkrutoSync Change World Deal with Checklist”.
Previously, I’ve tried having only one listing — one which synced to a Change interface on my house Wi-Fi community. The Change interface is offered to the iPhone by an AkrutoSync app operating on my laptop computer. I attempted to make sure that I had no listing that sync’d with every other cloud.
I ponder if the improve to third era SE prompted the lists to proliferate? Apple technical care did one thing behind the scenes to allow the switch of all content material from the previous telephone to the brand new one. I used to be on the telephone with them and I did not perceive what they did. Frankly, it did not look like they absolutely understood both.
I’ve had a 12 months to change particulars of particular person contacts. What’s an environment friendly solution to browse lists in a pairwise vogue so as to reconcile the variations?
As soon as achieved, I intend to eradicate all redundant lists. I anticipate that this implies preserving (4), and if (3) is merely an aggregation oof all lists underneath AkrutoSync Change, then meaning (3) will stick round as effectively [(and it will be identical to (4)].