As a library developer, you might create a well-liked utility that tons of of
hundreds of builders depend on every day, reminiscent of lodash or React. Over time,
utilization patterns would possibly emerge that transcend your preliminary design. When this
occurs, you might want to increase an API by including parameters or modifying
perform signatures to repair edge circumstances. The problem lies in rolling out
these breaking modifications with out disrupting your customers’ workflows.
That is the place codemods are available—a strong software for automating
large-scale code transformations, permitting builders to introduce breaking
API modifications, refactor legacy codebases, and keep code hygiene with
minimal guide effort.
On this article, we’ll discover what codemods are and the instruments you’ll be able to
use to create them, reminiscent of jscodeshift, hypermod.io, and codemod.com. We’ll stroll by real-world examples,
from cleansing up characteristic toggles to refactoring element hierarchies.
You’ll additionally learn to break down advanced transformations into smaller,
testable items—a apply generally known as codemod composition—to make sure
flexibility and maintainability.
By the top, you’ll see how codemods can grow to be an important a part of your
toolkit for managing large-scale codebases, serving to you retain your code clear
and maintainable whereas dealing with even essentially the most difficult refactoring
duties.
Breaking Adjustments in APIs
Returning to the state of affairs of the library developer, after the preliminary
launch, new utilization patterns emerge, prompting the necessity to prolong an
For easy modifications, a fundamental find-and-replace within the IDE would possibly work. In
extra advanced circumstances, you would possibly resort to utilizing instruments like sed
or awk
. Nevertheless, when your library is extensively adopted, the
scope of such modifications turns into tougher to handle. You may’t make certain how
extensively the modification will impression your customers, and the very last thing
you need is to interrupt present performance that doesn’t want
updating.
A typical strategy is to announce the breaking change, launch a brand new
model, and ask customers emigrate at their very own tempo. However this workflow,
whereas acquainted, usually does not scale properly, particularly for main shifts.
Contemplate React’s transition from class elements to perform elements
with hooks—a paradigm shift that took years for giant codebases to totally
undertake. By the point groups managed emigrate, extra breaking modifications had been
usually already on the horizon.
For library builders, this case creates a burden. Sustaining
a number of older variations to assist customers who haven’t migrated is each
pricey and time-consuming. For customers, frequent modifications danger eroding belief.
They might hesitate to improve or begin exploring extra secure alternate options,
which perpetuating the cycle.
However what if you happen to may assist customers handle these modifications mechanically?
What if you happen to may launch a software alongside your replace that refactors
their code for them—renaming features, updating parameter order, and
eradicating unused code with out requiring guide intervention?
That’s the place codemods are available. A number of libraries, together with React
and Subsequent.js, have already embraced codemods to easy the trail for model
bumps. For instance, React gives codemods to deal with the migration from
older API patterns, just like the previous Context API, to newer ones.
So, what precisely is the codemod we’re speaking about right here?
What’s a Codemod?
A codemod (code modification) is an automatic script used to rework
code to comply with new APIs, syntax, or coding requirements. Codemods use
Summary Syntax Tree (AST) manipulation to use constant, large-scale
modifications throughout codebases. Initially developed at Fb, codemods helped
engineers handle refactoring duties for giant tasks like React. As
Fb scaled, sustaining the codebase and updating APIs turned
more and more troublesome, prompting the event of codemods.
Manually updating hundreds of recordsdata throughout totally different repositories was
inefficient and error-prone, so the idea of codemods—automated scripts
that rework code—was launched to deal with this drawback.
The method sometimes includes three most important steps:
- Parsing the code into an AST, the place every a part of the code is
represented as a tree construction. - Modifying the tree by making use of a change, reminiscent of renaming a
perform or altering parameters. - Rewriting the modified tree again into the supply code.
By utilizing this strategy, codemods be certain that modifications are utilized
constantly throughout each file in a codebase, decreasing the possibility of human
error. Codemods may also deal with advanced refactoring eventualities, reminiscent of
modifications to deeply nested buildings or eradicating deprecated API utilization.
If we visualize the method, it will look one thing like this:
Determine 1: The three steps of a typical codemod course of
The concept of a program that may “perceive” your code after which carry out
computerized transformations isn’t new. That’s how your IDE works while you
run refactorings like
Basically, your IDE parses the supply code into ASTs and applies
predefined transformations to the tree, saving the outcome again into your
recordsdata.
For contemporary IDEs, many issues occur beneath the hood to make sure modifications
are utilized accurately and effectively, reminiscent of figuring out the scope of
the change and resolving conflicts like variable title collisions. Some
refactorings even immediate you to enter parameters, reminiscent of when utilizing
order of parameters or default values earlier than finalizing the change.
Use jscodeshift in JavaScript Codebases
Let’s have a look at a concrete instance to know how we may run a
codemod in a JavaScript mission. The JavaScript neighborhood has a number of
instruments that make this work possible, together with parsers that convert supply
code into an AST, in addition to transpilers that may rework the tree into
different codecs (that is how TypeScript works). Moreover, there are
instruments that assist apply codemods to whole repositories mechanically.
One of the vital in style instruments for writing codemods is jscodeshift, a toolkit maintained by Fb.
It simplifies the creation of codemods by offering a strong API to
manipulate ASTs. With jscodeshift, builders can seek for particular
patterns within the code and apply transformations at scale.
You should utilize jscodeshift
to determine and substitute deprecated API calls
with up to date variations throughout a whole mission.
Let’s break down a typical workflow for composing a codemod
manually.
Clear a Stale Characteristic Toggle
Let’s begin with a easy but sensible instance to display the
energy of codemods. Think about you’re utilizing a characteristic
toggle in your
codebase to regulate the discharge of unfinished or experimental options.
As soon as the characteristic is dwell in manufacturing and dealing as anticipated, the following
logical step is to scrub up the toggle and any associated logic.
As an example, take into account the next code:
const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-new-product-list') ? { title: 'Product' } : undefined;
As soon as the characteristic is absolutely launched and not wants a toggle, this
could be simplified to:
const knowledge = { title: 'Product' };
The duty includes discovering all situations of featureToggle
within the
codebase, checking whether or not the toggle refers to
feature-new-product-list
, and eradicating the conditional logic surrounding
it. On the similar time, different characteristic toggles (like
feature-search-result-refinement
, which can nonetheless be in improvement)
ought to stay untouched. The codemod must perceive the construction
of the code to use modifications selectively.
Understanding the AST
Earlier than we dive into writing the codemod, let’s break down how this
particular code snippet seems to be in an AST. You should utilize instruments like AST
Explorer to visualise how supply code and AST
are mapped. It’s useful to know the node varieties you are interacting
with earlier than making use of any modifications.
The picture beneath reveals the syntax tree by way of ECMAScript syntax. It
accommodates nodes like Identifier
(for variables), StringLiteral
(for the
toggle title), and extra summary nodes like CallExpression
and
ConditionalExpression
.
Determine 2: The Summary Syntax Tree illustration of the characteristic toggle examine
On this AST illustration, the variable knowledge
is assigned utilizing a
ConditionalExpression
. The check a part of the expression calls
featureToggle('feature-new-product-list')
. If the check returns true
,
the consequent department assigns { title: 'Product' }
to knowledge
. If
false
, the alternate department assigns undefined
.
For a job with clear enter and output, I choose writing assessments first,
then implementing the codemod. I begin by defining a destructive case to
guarantee we don’t by chance change issues we wish to go away untouched,
adopted by an actual case that performs the precise conversion. I start with
a easy state of affairs, implement it, then add a variation (like checking if
featureToggle is named inside an if assertion), implement that case, and
guarantee all assessments move.
This strategy aligns properly with Check-Pushed Growth (TDD), even
if you happen to don’t apply TDD usually. Realizing precisely what the
transformation’s inputs and outputs are earlier than coding improves security and
effectivity, particularly when tweaking codemods.
With jscodeshift, you’ll be able to write assessments to confirm how the codemod
behaves:
const rework = require("../remove-feature-new-product-list"); defineInlineTest( rework, {}, ` const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-new-product-list') ? { title: 'Product' } : undefined; `, ` const knowledge = { title: 'Product' }; `, "delete the toggle feature-new-product-list in conditional operator" );
The defineInlineTest
perform from jscodeshift means that you can outline
the enter, anticipated output, and a string describing the check’s intent.
Now, operating the check with a standard jest
command will fail as a result of the
codemod isn’t written but.
The corresponding destructive case would make sure the code stays unchanged
for different characteristic toggles:
defineInlineTest( rework, {}, ` const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-search-result-refinement') ? { title: 'Product' } : undefined; `, ` const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-search-result-refinement') ? { title: 'Product' } : undefined; `, "don't change different characteristic toggles" );
Writing the Codemod
Let’s begin by defining a easy rework perform. Create a file
referred to as rework.js
with the next code construction:
module.exports = perform(fileInfo, api, choices) { const j = api.jscodeshift; const root = j(fileInfo.supply); // manipulate the tree nodes right here return root.toSource(); };
This perform reads the file right into a tree and makes use of jscodeshift’s API to
question, modify, and replace the nodes. Lastly, it converts the AST again to
supply code with .toSource()
.
Now we are able to begin implementing the rework steps:
- Discover all situations of
featureToggle
. - Confirm that the argument handed is
'feature-new-product-list'
. - Change your complete conditional expression with the consequent half,
successfully eradicating the toggle.
Right here’s how we obtain this utilizing jscodeshift
:
module.exports = perform (fileInfo, api, choices) { const j = api.jscodeshift; const root = j(fileInfo.supply); // Discover ConditionalExpression the place the check is featureToggle('feature-new-product-list') root .discover(j.ConditionalExpression, { check: { callee: { title: "featureToggle" }, arguments: [{ value: "feature-new-product-list" }], }, }) .forEach((path) => { // Change the ConditionalExpression with the 'consequent' j(path).replaceWith(path.node.consequent); }); return root.toSource(); };
The codemod above:
- Finds
ConditionalExpression
nodes the place the check calls
featureToggle('feature-new-product-list')
. - Replaces your complete conditional expression with the resultant (i.e.,
{
), eradicating the toggle logic and leaving simplified code
title: 'Product' }
behind.
This instance demonstrates how straightforward it’s to create a helpful
transformation and apply it to a big codebase, considerably decreasing
guide effort.
You’ll want to put in writing extra check circumstances to deal with variations like
if-else
statements, logical expressions (e.g.,
!featureToggle('feature-new-product-list')
), and so forth to make the
codemod sturdy in real-world eventualities.
As soon as the codemod is prepared, you’ll be able to check it out on a goal codebase,
such because the one you are engaged on. jscodeshift gives a command-line
software that you should use to use the codemod and report the outcomes.
$ jscodeshift -t transform-name src/
After validating the outcomes, examine that each one practical assessments nonetheless
move and that nothing breaks—even if you happen to’re introducing a breaking change.
As soon as glad, you’ll be able to commit the modifications and lift a pull request as
a part of your regular workflow.
Codemods Enhance Code High quality and Maintainability
Codemods aren’t simply helpful for managing breaking API modifications—they’ll
considerably enhance code high quality and maintainability. As codebases
evolve, they usually accumulate technical debt, together with outdated characteristic
toggles, deprecated strategies, or tightly coupled elements. Manually
refactoring these areas could be time-consuming and error-prone.
By automating refactoring duties, codemods assist preserve your codebase clear
and freed from legacy patterns. Often making use of codemods means that you can
implement new coding requirements, take away unused code, and modernize your
codebase with out having to manually modify each file.
Refactoring an Avatar Element
Now, let’s have a look at a extra advanced instance. Suppose you’re working with
a design system that features an Avatar
element tightly coupled with a
Tooltip
. At any time when a person passes a title
prop into the Avatar
, it
mechanically wraps the avatar with a tooltip.
Determine 3: A avatar element with a tooltip
Right here’s the present Avatar
implementation:
import { Tooltip } from "@design-system/tooltip"; const Avatar = ({ title, picture }: AvatarProps) => { if (title) { return ( <Tooltip content material={title}> <CircleImage picture={picture} /> </Tooltip> ); } return <CircleImage picture={picture} />; };
The aim is to decouple the Tooltip
from the Avatar
element,
giving builders extra flexibility. Builders ought to be capable of determine
whether or not to wrap the Avatar
in a Tooltip
. Within the refactored model,
Avatar
will merely render the picture, and customers can apply a Tooltip
manually if wanted.
Right here’s the refactored model of Avatar
:
const Avatar = ({ picture }: AvatarProps) => { return <CircleImage picture={picture} />; };
Now, customers can manually wrap the Avatar
with a Tooltip
as
wanted:
import { Tooltip } from "@design-system/tooltip"; import { Avatar } from "@design-system/avatar"; const UserProfile = () => { return ( <Tooltip content material="Juntao Qiu"> <Avatar picture="/juntao.qiu.avatar.png" /> </Tooltip> ); };
The problem arises when there are tons of of Avatar usages unfold
throughout the codebase. Manually refactoring every occasion could be extremely
inefficient, so we are able to use a codemod to automate this course of.
Utilizing instruments like AST Explorer, we are able to
examine the element and see which nodes symbolize the Avatar
utilization
we’re focusing on. An Avatar
element with each title
and picture
props
is parsed into an summary syntax tree as proven beneath:
Determine 4: AST of the Avatar element utilization
Writing the Codemod
Let’s break down the transformation into smaller duties:
- Discover
Avatar
utilization within the element tree. - Examine if the
title
prop is current. - If not, do nothing.
- If current:
- Create a
Tooltip
node. - Add the
title
to theTooltip
. - Take away the
title
fromAvatar
. - Add
Avatar
as a toddler of theTooltip
. - Change the unique
Avatar
node with the brand newTooltip
.
To start, we’ll discover all situations of Avatar (I’ll omit among the
assessments, however it’s best to write comparability assessments first).
defineInlineTest(
{ default: rework, parser: "tsx" },
{},
`
<Avatar title="Juntao Qiu" picture="/juntao.qiu.avatar.png" />
`,
`
<Tooltip content material="Juntao Qiu">
<Avatar picture="/juntao.qiu.avatar.png" />
</Tooltip>
`,
"wrap avatar with tooltip when title is supplied"
);
Just like the featureToggle
instance, we are able to use root.discover
with
search standards to find all Avatar nodes:
root .discover(j.JSXElement, { openingElement: { title: { title: "Avatar" } }, }) .forEach((path) => { // now we are able to deal with every Avatar occasion });
Subsequent, we examine if the title
prop is current:
root
.discover(j.JSXElement, {
openingElement: { title: { title: "Avatar" } },
})
.forEach((path) => {
const avatarNode = path.node;
const nameAttr = avatarNode.openingElement.attributes.discover(
(attr) => attr.title.title === "title"
);
if (nameAttr) {
const tooltipElement = createTooltipElement(
nameAttr.worth.worth,
avatarNode
);
j(path).replaceWith(tooltipElement);
}
});
For the createTooltipElement
perform, we use the
jscodeshift API to create a brand new JSX node, with the title
prop utilized to the Tooltip
and the Avatar
element as a toddler. Lastly, we name replaceWith
to
substitute the present path
.
Right here’s a preview of the way it seems to be in
Hypermod, the place the codemod is written on
the left. The highest half on the proper is the unique code, and the underside
half is the remodeled outcome:
Determine 5: Run checks inside hypermod earlier than apply it to your codebase
This codemod searches for all situations of Avatar
. If a
title
prop is discovered, it removes the title
prop
from Avatar
, wraps the Avatar
inside a
Tooltip
, and passes the title
prop to the
Tooltip
.
By now, I hope it’s clear that codemods are extremely helpful and
that the workflow is intuitive, particularly for large-scale modifications the place
guide updates could be an enormous burden. Nevertheless, that is not the entire
image. Within the subsequent part, I’ll make clear among the challenges
and the way we are able to handle these less-than-ideal features.